‘Corruption Bay’ Living Up To Its Name?

This is a big post, in two ways. First, because there’s a lot of money involved. And second, because an incredible claim I stumbled upon throws up a very disturbing possibility.

HITTING THE BIG TIME (REVISITED)

In July I wrote about companies in south east Wales being bought out and having lots of money pumped into them. You’ll find it here; ‘Saving The Planet – The Globalist Way!’.

These companies are involved in, “energy efficiency“; which means ‘retrofitting’ homes with solar panels, cavity wall insulation, heat pumps, loft insulation, that kind of thing.

They’re all linked under the holding company Dragon 2023 Topco Ltd. From the most recent accounts submitted to Companies House here’s a list of the companies owned.

And here’s my table of the interlinked companies and individuals involved, in pdf format with working links. (And helpful notes!)

The majority shareholding in Dragon 2023 Topco lies with Cairngorm Capital Partners LLP of Edinburgh. Part of the Cairngorm group of companies. Dragon 2023 Topco’s directors are: Robert Brodie; Chris McLain; Andrew Steel, managing partner of Cairngorm Capital Partners LLP; and Jonathan Neale.

Steel is also named as the controlling interest.

Another key player is, or was, Matt Anstead, managing director of Cairngorm Capital Partners LLP. Below is a clip from Anstead’s Linkedin page.

You’ll see Anstead joined Cairngorm around the time they took over the Welsh companies. Was he brought in for that job? And was the takeover funded with three loans in 2024 from Metro Bank?

Funding to the companies themselves comes from Alter Domus, a company registered in Luxembourg, that seeks ‘alternative investments’, and was recently taken over itself by another private equity firm Cinven.

What’s really behind it is, as ever, money. Local companies expand thanks to the UK government ECO4 scheme, making them attractive to bigger fish; while also offering opportunities for others to profit from investing in these companies and then claiming to be saving the planet in some way.

There are obviously pay-offs for those who’ve been previously involved in the companies, and of course jobs are created; but as ever – this being socialist Wales – the real money leaves the country.

I make that point because, as you should know by now, I support the capitalist model, and I have no objections to profits being made. But as a Welshman, and a nationalist, it pisses me off to see the profits leave Wales.

Wasn’t devolution supposed to improve things?

Before pushing on maybe I should remind you that July’s post was in two parts. One dealt with the companies taken over by Cairngorm Capital; the other with companies in the same area, and the same line of business, that were taken over by Buckthorn Partners LLP of Jersey.

Maybe I’ll return to this second lot another day.

NICK PRITCHARD

Now we’re going to look at another man with a role in (he certainly benefitted from) the takeovers we just looked at. Though it’s not always easy to figure it out.

If the name rings a bell, it might be because Pritchard appeared in a Nation.Cymru article a few weeks back written by Martin ‘Shippo’ Shipton. It recounted Pritchard’s conviction in 2010 for growing cannabis, or providing premises where it might be grown.

So why bring it up now? Because Pritchard is associated with Reform UK, and may wish to stand for the UK parliament. This interest in his past is another sign of the desperate establishment that recently sent down Nathan Gill for something he said in 2018, and is now hunting for people Nigel Farage might have thrown milk over in kindergarten.

All done because the Globalist elite, and the political and media establishments they control, are getting worried by the rise of the ‘far right’ across the Western world. And so, as a mouthpiece for the Corruption Bay Uniparty, Nation.Cymru must get stuck in . . . or risk losing its ‘Welsh Government’ funding.

That said, Nick Pritchard is an interesting character; he seems to be a bit of a Jack the Lad, always looking for ways to make money. Nothing wrong with that as long as you stay on the sunny side.

But things never seem to be simple with Pritchard. Take this piece from Ideas Fest promoting his appearance at some event next year (my highlighting):

In 2013, Nick founded City Energy Network, an innovative energy efficiency consultancy based in Cardiff. The company specialises in the full retrofit journey from initial consultation to the implementation of the renewable measures recommended, his group of companies plan, and installs energy efficiency and low carbon measures for both homes and businesses and also specialises in Local Authority large scale projects.

But it makes no sense.

For a start, City Energy Network Ltd (CEN) was formed in 2011, but Pritchard’s name never appeared as a director or a shareholder. Perhaps because, Pritchard, sent down in 2010 for three-and-a-half years, would have been in prison when CEN was formed.

And what’s included in “the group of companies“?

Seeing as 2013 is mentioned by Ideas Fest, Pritchard may have been represented by one or both of Nicola Vaughan and Michelle Roberts, who became CEN directors 31.01.2014.

But even after he was released from prison I’m fairly sure Pritchard would have been disqualified from acting as a director for a few years. If he was operating through Roberts and / or Vaughan at CEN then “proxy management” is a criminal offence.

Coinciding with the arrival of Roberts and Vaughan all 100 CEN shares were transferred to Diversity Network Holdings Ltd (DNH), which Roberts and Vaughan had joined 28.01.2014. Pritchard didn’t become a director until April 2020.

A declaration dated 28.01.2015 shows the 100 DNH shares now distributed thus:

Though Pritchard did join Diversity Network Ltd 14.05.2012, which might have been not long after he was out of prison. And surely disqualified? Also directors were Michelle Roberts and Shelley Roberts.

There are other anomalies I could point out. Check names, DoB, dates.

When he was sent to prison Pritchard was reported to be in the “lettings business” in Bangor and other parts of north west Wales. He’s from Bangor, passionate about the local football club, he serves on the city council, so how and why did he get involved with companies in a totally different line of business at the opposite end of the country?

Hoping to make sense of it on a wet night with no football on the telly, I compiled a list of the companies Pritchard’s been involved with. Here it is, with the company name serving as a hyperlink.

You’ll see three company names in yellow blocks. These are also found in the previous table I linked to, showing the companies taken over by Cairngorm Capital. His past involvement with these companies perhaps accounts for Pritchard’s sizeable share allocation in holding company Dragon 2023 Topco Ltd.

You’ll see other individuals there with sizeable shareholdings. All have been involved with the companies we’re looking at. And Ahmud Saleem Eamon Furreed is a Labour party donor. (There may be other donors.)

Obviously, companies doing the kind of work we’re looking at need a stamp of approval, some accreditation. From a company like Quidos of Bath. And as you can see if you scroll down on that link, you have to pay for it.

But Pritchard now seems to own Quidos through year-old Quidos Holdings Ltd!

It could make life easier when you’ve got big stakes in companies ‘retrofitting’ and you also own a company that’ll give them a certificate to put up on the office wall saying they know what they’re doing.

Though many would disagree. Such as those involved with this website. Or those who gave these reviews to a company that’s among the clutch bought up by Cairngorm.

And we’ve all heard tales of cavity wall insulation resulting in damp and other horrors. I could tell you my own story.

You might have noticed that in some of his most recent business ventures Pritchard has been joined by celeb economist Dylan Jones-Evans.

What the hell is that about?

WHERE IT GETS WEIRD

While researching this article I stumbled upon a remarkable letter addressed to Paul Davies AS/SM, in his capacity as chair of the Senedd Economy, Trade and Rural Affairs Committee.

It gets included in this piece because I’m convinced there’s a connection to what you’ve just read. Anyway, here’s the (redacted) letter. I urge you to read it carefully and consider what it alleges.

After reading it I last Monday I e-mailed Paul Davies asking what had happened to the complaint. Here’s his response. (The links don’t work as there’s an issue with linking to pdf docs created from e-mails.)

So here’s the link to the report on the DBW he references (Section 9).

I asked if I could use his response and he agreed.

I would have tried to contact the complainant, but one problem was that I believe he’s moved from his original address. The other reason will be given later.

What the letter alleges is that the complainant (hereinafter referred to as ‘A’) came up with a good idea, and was doing quite well . . .

The company grew quickly and gained significant market traction with companies such as Sainsburys Supermarkets and BT Openreach.

But presumably needing to expand, ‘A’ in 2017 applied to Finance Wales (now Development Bank of Wales) for a loan. That’s when things started going wrong.

Not only does ‘A’ claim he had to take on “a bank-appointed expert”, and pay that ‘expert’ £150,000 pa, but . . .

Less than 1 year later, I was accused of taking “unauthorised funds” from the company’s bank account and sacked.

This happened to be just 1 month after my refusal to sell the business to BT Group.

I lost my job, my shares (approx £3.8m at that time), my patent (£13m-£17m valuation) and was forced to go bankrupt in September 2018.

Is the complainant suggesting a link between him refusing to sell up to the BT Group and the criminal charges that soon followed?

Things got even worse. ‘A’ was arrested, tried at Swansea Crown Court – but was acquitted by the jury. (Which might explain why the Labour government in Westminster wants trials without juries.)

To add insult to injury . . .

To note, after my dismissal the business was moved from Lampeter . . . where we employed up to 17 local people to Cardiff. Where they employed only 3.

After the business moved to Cardiff, both [name redacted] and [name redacted] set up new battery storage business, using my invention, and even got further funding from DBoW for these copy cat companies.

That is one hell of a story. And yet, if you think about it, the danger of such an outcome is always there. Just imagine . . .

Dai Schmuck out in the sticks comes up with a good idea, but he needs money to expand. So he goes to the Development Bank of Wales. They appoint ‘advisors’, who may move in the same circles as the bank officials who give them the gig.

The DBW admits to appointing the same favourites as ‘advisors’ again and again.

In a follow up letter to the Committee’s session with the Bank, the Chief Executive noted that it did re-appoint the same people
multiple times if it thought that person was a good match and had capacity.

Though an unscrupulous ‘advisor’ might say to himself: “Hang on, this bloke’s got a good idea – let’s nick it and make a fortune“. It’s a sweet system, but only if you’re well connected in Corruption Bay.

I could tell you more, but I’d be sticking my scrawny neck out. What I will say is that as I know the name of the company ‘A’ is referring to I can probably identify those he claims ripped him off.

From what I can see, ‘A’s allegations seem to have been kicked into the long grass. Maybe nobody in Corruption Bay wants to know the truth. Or perhaps they don’t want us to know the truth.

But the real twist is that ‘A’ is now teamed up with Nick Pritchard. And this happened soon after he started making waves with his letter to Andrew Davies.

What the hell is that about?

CONCLUSION

We need an independent investigation into the Development Bank of Wales.

In particular, we need to know how it chooses ‘advisors’ for small companies needing help. We also need to know the conditions imposed on those companies. And the behaviour expected of the ‘advisors’.

But then, it’s unlikely anyone will get straight answers. Because Wales is corrupt.

All devolution has done is give Labour more chances to be corrupt, more money to squander, while also providing more opportunities for cronyism. Third sector outfits, pressure groups (closed to non-socialists), are funded to fight problems that don’t exist.

Sinecures and non-jobs for insiders proliferate.

In recent decades Labour’s joined forces with Plaid Cymru. Together, they’ve built a fortress they see as a bastion from where they combat racists, homophobes, climate deniers, Islamophobes, a white supremacist countryside, misinformation, and colonialist Welsh cakes!

In truth, it’s ‘Corruption Bay’, and its enemies are honesty and openness.

Because what they get up to must be kept secret. This explains why Corruption Bay is unique in the Western world in refusing to have a register of lobbyists. “Why do you need to know?

But I’m forgetting Cairngorm Capital, Nick Pritchard and the rest . . . here we have a man with a ‘colourful’ past, dubious associates, now teamed up with Professor Dylan Jones-Evans, who’s often critical of the DBW. Pritchard also teamed up with ‘A’ soon after ‘A’s complaint against DBW was heard.

What the hell is that about?

Answers on a postcard please. (I will not accept diagrams or flowcharts.)

♦ end ♦

© Royston Jones 2025

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

36 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wynne

Jac. No need to upload this note to your blog but have you seen the zip folder I sent to you earlier today to your editor email address. It was in reply to your note to me about Cardigan hospital site. Try and read it as I was provided with misleading info. Thanks

Dafis

A special note for those who insist that the “Nation of Sanctuary” nonsense is non- negotiable. Just wait till one of these lovely people comes to your street and takes your daughter or wife for a “walk in the woods”.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-open-borders-crime-scandal/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=CampaignMonitor_Editorial&utm_campaign=LNCH%20%20ALLIANCE%20%2020251209%20%20AC+CID_b538997e3260825012c58beadad65c41

Dafis

I have been and probably remain further to the “left” than that Wanchor Starmer has ever been. However my socialism was all about creating and maintaining a fair society where people could gain education, stay healthy or get medical services swiftly, get a decent paid job with a modicum of security and a bit of a safety net if it didn’t work out for a while. Instead we have a social security system which is a lifestyle choice for many and a magnet for a significant segment of those who choose to make a hazardous trip to the UK. We have an industrial landscape that has been destabilised or destroyed thus eradicating the job opportunities for the working class. Our education system is too focus on “ishoos” of the day rather than the solid grounding of knowledge and learning skills that give young people a chance in life. Too many kids are dumped as failures due to the systemic failures that crush their chances. And the NHS is just a log jam much of it due to bad individual life choices and inadequate service responses at all levels.

So “Far Right”, a term commonly used by people of limited vocabulary and imagination, is a label I cheerfully reject. As a socialist I would have embraced the label “national socialist” but unfortunately others came along nearly a century ago and gave that label a permanently bad name. So I’ll stick to my identity that refuses to be tagged by others.

D P

the statement about having to take on an expert/consultant reminds me of an old story about Germany – a British construction/development company had a project in lets say Frankfurt and was told that things would be a lot easier if the spouse of a local authority functionary was put on the payroll.

They turned it down as bribery and corruption were not the done thing old chap. Looks like the European practices have now come to these shores.

Dafis

…and inclusive, of course, especially if the retained individual is already well plumbed into other local networks. A daisy chain of spongers.

Dafis

Last week Rachel’s Budget promised us £150 off our energy bills. Today the state’s media mouthpiece announces that we are about to get shafted again via those energy bills. Another blow struck by climate obsessed politicians.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp84yymxpjno?ua_linkname=bbcnews_energygridinvestmentof28billiontopushuphouseholdbillscostoflivinghero1of7_newsbusiness&at_campaign=crm&at_objective=conversion&at_medium=emails&at_ptr_name=airship&at_campaign_type=owned&at_ptr_type=media&at_creation=

Wynne

I think the attached cartoon sums up the position in this country very well.

PharmaChristmas200
Gruff Williams

Are you and Shipton mates now? He seems to be doing some decent reporting of late.

David Smith

Is Nathan Gaol the victim of a witch hunt? As a longtime face within successive iterations of Nige’s British Nationalist parties, and taking the Rouble, he is at the very least a shit.

If it’s the same bloke, I was once told by someone who very much has his ear to the ground in Bangor that Nick Pritchard is not liked in the least in his home city. So little, that his ‘official’ sobriquet is Nick the Prick. Take that for what it’s worth.

As for your snag with the PDF links, drop me a line and I might be able to help.

David Smith

As long as all is good my dearest Jac. As well as being a software engineer by trade I am also something of a name in the blogosphere myself nowadays you know 😉. But seriously if you get stuck on these kinds of things you know my email address.

Dafis

If you feel your shirt tail lifting then it’s not likely to be just a bit draughty!

David Smith

Oi, cheeky!

Dafis

The amount of dodgy dealing and outright corruption that occurs at the interface between government agencies and “investors” into the wider green energy/saving the planet business sectors is at a shocking level. Therefore, it is surprising that business leaders and assorted trade associations don’t kick up a fuss about the diversion of funding into these ventures that are often opaque or even impenetrable. Or is everybody in on it or just waiting their turn to guzzle at the trough?

MSX150

Kick up a fuss to who?, everyone is complicit from the top to the bottom, go ahead and try it, you would be lucky to get a response, we have one hope and one hope only, vote them out, all of them, cut the head off the snake, and like them or loathe them only only party will do it, (all the others are already in the club, no mater what they say)….they may not be the long term answer… but only one will drain the swamp

Wynne

When everyone realises that all government ministers are simply globalist puppets enforcing [not making] policy, everything starts to make sense.

Wynne

Yes, Larry Fink and Bill Gates appear to be able to fly into the country in their executive jets [offsetting their carbon emissions no doubt] and have a meeting with the prime minister with no minutes of the meeting kept. I think that is all we need to know about the state of democracy in this country.

Wynne

I think it was the French who invented the Guillotine !!

David Smith

Is this the natural endgame for corporatism?

Dafis

I guess my question was largely rhetorical. If you have watched these pages for a few years you will note that I have gone on at length about the new “axis of evil” – the ever- growing bond between big business and big government in UK and internationally. That leaves small and medium sized business at the mercy of the manipulators, out in the cold when the goodies get carved up unless one is lucky enough to be tipped as a rising star by one of the many shadowy financial institutions that are busy pulling strings and filling the boots of well placed influencers, movers and shakers.

I admire your faith in that “only one party will do it” although I fear that they are also too well connected with the axis of evil to ever really drain any big swamps. At least, in 2026 we can expect them to chuck out the basket of snakes at Cardiff Bay, may go on to take Westminster in 2029 but at that stage they will probably enter the partnership they currently purport to despise.

MSX150

big business and big government?, small percentage of the problem here in wales I would say, small and medium “business” wholly reliant or in many cases just “stealing” from the public purse via cosy contracts, grants and loans…. is an equal if not greater problem.

I have faith but also agree with you that they too will be well connected and the status quo will resume albeit a different faction receiving our hard earned….just at this point in history they are the only ones willing to pull the pin on the grenade and blows the whole thing up (metaphorically speaking before a bot flags this up and I end up with my door kicked in at 5am)….. long term I believe the only way forward to avoid this (apart from educating voters which our Mr Jac does very well), is proportional representation, long advocated by the smaller parties, but I am willing to place a small wager that Labour / conservative may actually bring this in before the next general election as a weapon to prevent the others enjoying the very position they have been enjoying for an eternity…. anyway I digress, and that is a conversation for another day!

Dafis

May be a very small slice of the problem here in Wales although Big Biz and Big Gov are very much on the same page in UK, EU and further afield. The Bay regime certainly defers to the preferences of the axis and are often found getting multinationals to handle projects which could have been executed by consortia of smaller medium companies. Government contracts are notoriously badly negotiated and are prone to huge cost overruns recharged to the public purse. Now I appreciate that much of the fault lies among inept public sector purchasing execs who prefer one big deal as it allegedly makes their lives easier. The smaller businesses are often found further back in the supply chain squeezed by the major tier one contractors for next to zero profits and damaging credit terms.